The 80/20 Rule: Mastering Adversary Cyber Threat Detection 

The threat landscape is increasingly defined not by headline vulnerabilities but by repeated patterns. Attackers reuse what works — and that’s exactly where defenders should focus.

The 80/20 Rule of Detection

CyberStash’s recent whitepaper outlines a powerful yet underutilised principle: By targeting the Top 20 most common adversary techniques, organisations can achieve a high level of detection efficiency without an overwhelming resource investment. This shifts the paradigm from chasing zero-days to dominating the repeatable tactics adversaries rely on.

Detection Strategy Built on Prevalence, Choke Points, and Actionability

This triad approach ensures security teams are not just technically capable but operationally focused.

·         📊 Prevalence: Techniques that appear most frequently in real-world attacks

·         🔗 Choke Points: Points in the kill chain that multiple other techniques depend on

·         ⚡ Actionability: Techniques where defenders can realistically detect or mitigate

Top 20 Techniques: What They Reveal About Real Attacks

CyberStash’s curated list includes techniques like PowerShell abuse (T1059), Credential Dumping (T1003), and WMI misuse (T1047) — all of which appear in ransomware, espionage, and supply chain breaches. These techniques form the battleground of real cyber conflict.

Real-World Application: Five Case Studies

Each of these attacks used repeatable, known tactics that could have been detected early using CyberStash’s Top 20 detection rules. This is not theory — it’s repeatable, measurable success.

·         Volt Typhoon: PowerShell + Scheduled Tasks + Obfuscation

·         LockBit 3.0: Credential Dumping + CLI Execution + File Obfuscation

·         SolarWinds: Scheduled Tasks + Remote WMI

·         WannaCry: SMB Exploitation + File Obfuscation

·         NotPetya: Credential Access + PowerShell + Obfuscation

Hunting, Not Just Detecting

Effective threat detection isn’t about waiting for alerts — it’s about proactive threat hunting. Relaxing detection logic to include broader uses of common techniques enables earlier identification of suspicious behaviour, even when a specific IOC is absent.

Tailoring to Specialised Environments

The framework is extensible to OT/ICS environments where technique selection must be augmented by domain-specific knowledge. However, the principle holds: identify the choke points, prioritise actionability, and optimise for the adversary’s most used paths.

From EDR to Managed XDR: Why Strategy Matters

This layered model moves defence from log collection to adversary disruption. It’s not about collecting more data — it’s about acting on what matters most.

·         EDR tools are reactive and endpoint-bound

·         Extended Detection and Response (XDR) correlates telemetry across domains

·         Managed XDR services ensure continuous visibility, detection, and mitigation — without the overhead

Takeaways for CISOs

·         🎯 Focus on the Top 20 MITRE ATT&CK techniques — they’re real, frequent, and actionable

·         🔍 Build detection strategy around chokepoints, not product features

·         🧠 Empower hunting teams with relaxed but reliable rulesets

·         📈 Use XDR and Managed XDR to operationalise and scale detection maturity

Book a Threat Review

🔗 Request a pilot or see a live demo of Eclipse.XDR